Back to Basics: Things to Think About When Setting Cover Work

An article by Richard James Rogers (Award-Winning Author of The Quick Guide to Classroom Management and The Power of Praise: Empowering Students Through Positive Feedback)

Illustrated by Sutthiya Lertyongphati

A true story is mentioned in this blog post. Names, and, in some cases, genders, have been changed in order to protect anonymity. Any similarity to real people is purely coincidental.

Cover teachers are there to supervise the lessons you’ve provided materials for, but are your students where they need to be in the Scheme of Work? Are their notebooks marked? Is everything as it should be?

Communication is crucial when setting cover work. Double-check: Does everyone know what they need to know, and has the information been received?

5 Things Every UK School Should Know Before Going Solar

Old-School Teaching Techniques Are Back!

When students write by hand, they engage more brain systems than when typing.

Are your classroom routines truly embedded?

Employers are increasingly reporting that fresh graduates lack basic, essential skills.

Final Thought

Bibliography and References

  1. Common Sense Media (2022) Social Media, Social Life: Teens Reveal Their Experiences. San Francisco: Common Sense Media.
  2. Education Endowment Foundation (2020) Cognitive Load: Using Instructional Approaches to Reduce Learners Mental Burden. London: EEF.
  3. Hattie, J. (2018) Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 1,400 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
  4. Institute of Education Sciences (2018) What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  5. Lemov, D. (2021) Teach Like a Champion 3.0. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Marzano, R.J. (2003) What Works in Schools: Translating Research into Action. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  6. Mueller, P.A. and Oppenheimer, D.M. (2014) The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), pp.1159 to 1168.
  7. OECD (2021) OECD Skills Outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  8. Roediger, H.L. and Karpicke, J.D. (2006) Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), pp.249 to 255.
  9. Sweller, J. (2019) Cognitive Load Theory and Educational Technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), pp.507 to 528.
  10. University of Maryland (2018) Print vs Digital Reading: A Meta-Analysis on Comprehension. College Park: UMD.
  11. Wiliam, D. (2016) Leadership for Teacher Learning. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Sciences International.
  12. Wolf, M. (2018) Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. New York: HarperCollins.
  13. UNESCO (2021) Futures of Education: Learning to Become. Paris: UNESCO.

The 3I/Atlas Enigma: Interstellar Anomalies, the Wow! Signal, and Lessons for the Classroom

Note: Selected images in this article have been sourced from Pixabay and are free to use under the Pixabay License (no attribution required).

How to Redesign Learning Spaces for Well-Being and Engagement

‘You belong here. You can grow here.’

  • Ashburner, J., Ziviani, J. and Rodger, S., 2008. Sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioural, and educational outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(5), pp.564–573.
  • Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J. and Kobbacy, K., 2015. A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 89, pp.118–133.
  • Botha, M. and Frost, D., 2020. Extending the neurodiversity paradigm: Autism, identity and learning space inclusion. Disability & Society, 35(8), pp.1364–1386.
  • Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S.A., Plaut, V.C. and Meltzoff, A.N., 2014. Designing classrooms to maximise student achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1(1), pp.4–12.
  • Fisher, K., 2016. The New Learning Environments Research Group: Linking pedagogy and space. The University of Melbourne.
  • Heschong, L., 2003. Daylighting and human performance. ASHRAE Journal, 45(6), pp.65–67.
  • Korpershoek, H., Canrinus, E.T., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. and de Boer, H., 2019. The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Educational Research Review, 27, pp.100–118.
  • Li, D. and Sullivan, W.C., 2016. Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, pp.149–158.
  • Oblinger, D.G., 2006. Learning Spaces. EDUCAUSE, Washington, DC.
  • OECD, 2021. The Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Parcells, C., Stommel, M. and Hubbard, R.P., 1999. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: Empirical findings and health implications. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24(4), pp.265–273.
  • Rands, M.L. and Gansemer-Topf, A.M., 2017. The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), pp.26–33.
  • Tanner, C.K., 2008. Explaining relationships among student outcomes and the school’s physical environment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), pp.444–471.


Back to Basics: How to Set a Summative Assessment

Vattøy, K-D., Gamlem, S. M. & Rogne, W. M. (2021) Examining students’ feedback engagement and assessment experiences: a mixed study. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), pp. 2325-2337. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1723523

The Top 5 Skills Employers Want in 2025 (and How Schools Should Respond)

ChatGPT 5 and Beyond: My Top 3 AI Tools for Teachers in 2025 and Beyond

@richard_james_rogers

My favourite GenAI apps for teachers in 2025. #GenAI #AI

♬ original sound – Duet Cats – Duet Cats